The Mummy (2017) 3D YIFY Movie

The Mummy (2017) 3D

An ancient Egyptian princess is awakened from her crypt beneath the desert, bringing with her malevolence grown over millennia, and terrors that defy human comprehension.

IMDB: 5.625 Likes

  • Genre: Action | Adventure
  • Quality: 3D
  • Size: 1.68G
  • Resolution: 1920*1080 / 23.976 fpsfps
  • Language: English
  • Run Time: 110
  • IMDB Rating: 5.6/10 
  • MPR: Normal
  • Peers/Seeds: 3 / 23

The Synopsis for The Mummy (2017) 3D

Though safely entombed in a crypt deep beneath the unforgiving desert, an ancient princess, whose destiny was unjustly taken from her, is awakened in our current day bringing with her malevolence grown over millennia, and terrors that defy human comprehension.

The Director and Players for The Mummy (2017) 3D

[Director]Alex Kurtzman
[Role:]Tom Cruise
[Role:]Annabelle Wallis
[Role:]Sofia Boutella

The Reviews for The Mummy (2017) 3D

Critics be damned!Reviewed byCyril JulienVote: 7/10

This is a good start for the rebooting of the Universal Dark Universe, if you're expecting a remake of the 1990's Mummy films then you've got the wrong idea. The first thing you should know is that this has NOTHING to do with those movies and are completely unrelated. This is a re-imagining of Mummy's Hand (1940) that started the Mummy series of movies but with a whole new agenda. This time Universal are making these films to link in with all their other monster movies, Frankenstein, Dracula, The Wolfman etc so comparing it with any other Mummy film before it like the critics keep doing is utterly pointless.

The movie is a high entertaining fantasy horror film, its not the glossy action comedy level of the Brendan Fraser films, its darker and a lot more violent but still full of spectacle and a decent amount of humour that doesn't completely dominate the dramatic content as many film allow these days. Only Disney's Goofy or Loony Toon's Wild E Coyote can take the level of battering Tom Cruise gets in this movie and still stay standing. The Mummy is an exotic beauty who can hit like a Mack Truck. There are elements reminiscent of An American Werewolf in London (1981) and Lifeforce (1985) that forge this version of the Mummy and Russell Crowe's Dr Jekyll makes his glorified entrance half way through to remind you this is a shared monster universe so expect more of the same.

Quite simply you either like this sort of stuff or you don't, if you listen to critics they'll convince you this is the worst movie ever made, it's not. It's actually really good fun and nothing more, it won't suddenly change your life and have you buying movie merchandise like a Star Wars film or Marvel franchise flick but it will entertain you if you're not already going into the cinema armed with a critical gun ready to shoot it down for daring to star Tom Cruise like the average Hollywood critic and their anti-Tom Cruise agenda.

Reviewed byCraig James Review (on Youtube)Vote: 3/10/10

"The Mummy" is the first movie in what Universal Studios wants to calltheir "Dark Universe." Yeah, that's right. Those re-shoots that 2014's"Dracula Untold" went through to tie into a Dark Universe; those don'tmatter now. That 2010 Benicio del Toro "Wolfman" movie; also doesn'tmatter.

In a world where Universes are becoming more and more of a thing,Universal seems determined not to let this monster mash-up of TheWolfman, Dracula, Frankenstein, Mummy, Dr. Jekyll and Mr Hyde and moreslip through their fingers.

And they're also not skimping out on finding A-list talent to help sellthe whole thing. So far we've heard Johnny Depp, The Rock, and JavierBardem's names being thrown into the mix, plus Russell Crowe is alreadyhere as Dr. Jekyll.

That last one I think is really cool by the way because while so manyothers have been portrayed by the likes of Gary Oldman and JackNicholson's, Jekyll's best portrayal in the past 20+ years has beenugh….David Hasselhoff.

But now let's talk about "The Mummy", specifically that old trilogywith Brendan Fraser. There's no doubt director Stephen Sommers luckedout with that first film and there's also little doubt Universal wantsto move away from that overall cheesiness here. The question is canthey still go serious but also have fun at the same time?

And say what you will about Sommers; the guy was a C-grade filmmakerwho got a kick out of a cheap thrill but at least you could say hecommitted to it. This new Mummy is just a wrong-headed disaster.

The set-up is pretty much the same as the older Mummy film althoughhere it's a woman played by "Kingsman's" Sofia Boutella. She's Ahmanet,an Egyptian Princess who wanted power, sold out to some powerful entityfor eternal life, and paid for it by getting entombed.

Universal of course is also putting it's faith in Tom Cruise, who playsan Army Vet prone towards treasure hunting. He and several others findAhmanet's sarcophygus but while bringing it back to be examined, theplane goes down over London and a bunch of strange things happen thatthey learn can't just be coincidence.

This is Cruise just being Cruise here. He gets to run around a lotdoing his "intense face" all while an attractive woman half his age isalong with him for the sexual interplay (more on her in a moment).Yeah, there's discussion about his character growing something of aconscience as this goes on but it's pretty perfunctory.

Plus having the Mummy be a woman after Cruise's body so she could planther demon God inside of him and they can reign as King and Queen; thisseems more like it falls into being of one of Cruise's aging vanityprojects than on acting skill.

Boutella gets very little to do otherwise but try and be seductivewhile waving her hands in a threatening manner. Otherwise auto-tunedoes the rest.

The Cruise character's love interest is an archaeologist played byAnnabelle Wallis who looks like she just stepped out from a Parisfashion show into an archaeological dig. Did I believe her as anarchaeologist? No. Did I believe she could spell it? Sure. Either way,it doesn't matter. What does is that she and Cruise are DOA in theirscenes together.

No character makes much impression here, including Crowe's Dr. Jekyllwho's maybe in the film for 20 minutes to explain stuff so simplistic,silly, and predictable that it hardly needs explaining at all beforethe film rushes through his particular ailment.

For some reason screenwriters David Koepp and Christopher McQuarriethink more explanation is still warranted though and in that theycouldn't be more wrong. For something trying to feel new, it'sremarkably easy to tell where all this is going.

Their biggest crime is what they do to New Girl's Jake Johnson, a funnyactor who they turn into the Dark Universe's version of Jar Jar Binksin only five minutes. He comes in and out of the film at really oddintervals, either screaming dialogue in the hope of making it funny orgiving us yet more exposition we don't really need.

Add to that first time action director Alex Kurtzman is a disaster. Theaction sequences look haphazardly thrown together, just cartoonish andunbelievable, while a spoiler I won't give away about the Tom Cruisecharacter makes them even harder to give a crap about anyway.

The fights are stiff and uninteresting, and the special effects areeither forgettable or look just as hokey as they did in the BrendanFraser movies. The plane sequence we saw in the trailer looks prettydecent but hey, you've already seen the most decent thing in the movie,why pay to see the rest.

Overall this is not just a bad film, but a film that has no idea whatit even is. It wants to resurrect classic monsters, but isn't the leastbit scary. It wants to take it in original directions, but winds upbeing an ultra-serious, dull version of the 1999 film. It's silly butnot funny, it's a lot of commotion but no excitement, it's a Mummymovie that if the ending of this can even be believed, thinks it'ssomething totally different. This is a worse start to a Universe thanKing Arthur was.

If you liked this, check out more of Craig James Review on Youtube

It's really not that bad!Reviewed bypjgs200Vote: 7/10

It's never good when you have to say "It's not that bad!" but I think the Mummy is being treated to harshly by critics. It has a 15% on Rotten Tomatoes. Really? It's not a great movie, but it is fun to watch and I thought the ending was very good. It felt a bit like a B- Movie in the beginning, but I still enjoyed it.

7 out of 10

The Mummy (2017) 3D Related Movies

Asphaltgorillas (2018) Poster

Asphaltgorillas (2018)

Doctor Strange (2016) 3D Poster

Doctor Strange (2016) 3D

Escape from the Bronx (1983) 1080p Poster

Escape from the Bronx (1983) 1080p

1990: The Bronx Warriors (1982) 1080p Poster

1990: The Bronx Warriors (1982) 1080p

In Like Flynn (2018) Poster

In Like Flynn (2018)

Kong: Skull Island (2017) 3D Poster

Kong: Skull Island (2017) 3D

The Golden Voyage of Sinbad (1973) Poster

The Golden Voyage of Sinbad (1973)

The New Barbarians (1983) 1080p Poster

The New Barbarians (1983) 1080p

Green Lantern (2011) | Fate/Grand Order | Der.Grinch.German.DL.AC3.Dubbed.720p.BluRay.x264-PsO