Was lifeless, characters had no emotion or personality , found myself rooting for gaston, he was the only cool one. Modern autotuned garbage. CGI was awful and way overdone. Nothing like the original. Songs were long and annoying. Dialogue felt rushed like they tried to cram all the stuff from the original into it but ran out of time.
Beauty and the Beast (2017) 1080p YIFY Movie
Beauty and the Beast (2017) 1080p
An adaptation of the fairy tale about a monstrous-looking prince and a young woman who fall in love.
IMDB: 7.7168 Likes
The Synopsis for Beauty and the Beast (2017) 1080p
Disney's animated classic takes on a new form, with a widened mythology and an all-star cast. A young prince, imprisoned in the form of a beast, can be freed only by true love. What may be his only opportunity arrives when he meets Belle, the only human girl to ever visit the castle since it was enchanted.
The Director and Players for Beauty and the Beast (2017) 1080p
The Reviews for Beauty and the Beast (2017) 1080p
As boring and emotionless as twilightReviewed byamythiessenVote: 1/10
My title says it all. Even with releasing nude photos of herself and playing it up as a 'hack' Emma Watson fails to deliver in this predictable, cliché, gyno-centric feminist's wet dream of a reboot. You'd think Hollywood would stop trying to dictate what the audience finds entertaining, but it seems nobody in Hollywood wants to make any money anymore. Maybe the film / television industry is going the way of the music industry. Maybe it should, the 'talent' has been full of themselves for far too long now.
As a fan of the original Disney film (Personally I feel it's theirmasterpiece) I was taken aback to the fact that a new version was inthe making. Still excited I had high hopes for the film. Most of wasshattered in the first 10 minutes. Campy acting with badly performedsinging starts off a long journey holding hands with some of the worstCGI Hollywood have managed to but to screen in ages.
A film that is over 50% GCI, should focus on making that partbelievable, unfortunately for this film, it's far from that. It lookslike the original film was ripped apart frame by frame and thebeautiful hand-painted drawings have been replaced with digitalcaricatures. Besides CGI that is bad, it's mostly creepy. As the littleteacup boy will give me nightmares for several nights to come. EmmaWatson plays the same character as she always does, with very littleacting effort and very little conviction as Belle. Although I can seewhy she was cast in the film based on merits, she is far from the rightchoice for the role. Dan Stevens does alright under as some motioncaptured dead-eyed Beast, but his performance feels flat as well. LukeEvans makes for a great pompous Gaston, but a character that has littledepth doesn't really make for a great viewing experience. Josh Gad is agreat comic relief just like the original movie's LeFou. Other thanthat, none of the cast stands out enough for me to remember them. Humanor CHI creature. I was just bored through out the whole experience. Andfor a project costing $160 000 000, I can see why the PR department ispushing it so hard because they really need to get some cash back onthis pile of wet stinky CGI-fur!
All and all, I might be bias from really loving Disney's firstadaptation. That for me marks the high-point of all their work,perfectly combining the skills of their animators along with some CGIin a majestic blend. This film however is more like the bucket you washoff your paintbrush in, it has all the same colors, but muddled withwater and to thin to make a captivating story from. The film is quitefrankly not worth your time, you would be better off watching theoriginal one more time.