Beauty and the Beast (2017) 1080p YIFY Movie

Beauty and the Beast (2017) 1080p

An adaptation of the fairy tale about a monstrous-looking prince and a young woman who fall in love.

IMDB: 7.7170 Likes

  • Genre: Family | Fantasy
  • Quality: 1080p
  • Size: 1.96G
  • Resolution: 1920*1080 / 23.976 fpsfps
  • Language: English
  • Run Time: 129
  • IMDB Rating: 7.7/10 
  • MPR: Normal
  • Peers/Seeds: 33 / 605

The Synopsis for Beauty and the Beast (2017) 1080p

Disney's animated classic takes on a new form, with a widened mythology and an all-star cast. A young prince, imprisoned in the form of a beast, can be freed only by true love. What may be his only opportunity arrives when he meets Belle, the only human girl to ever visit the castle since it was enchanted.


The Director and Players for Beauty and the Beast (2017) 1080p

[Director]Bill Condon
[Role:]Emma Watson
[Role:]Dan Stevens
[Role:]Luke Evans


The Reviews for Beauty and the Beast (2017) 1080p


Reviewed byphantom_pixieVote: 1/10/10

As a fan of the original Disney film (Personally I feel it's theirmasterpiece) I was taken aback to the fact that a new version was inthe making. Still excited I had high hopes for the film. Most of wasshattered in the first 10 minutes. Campy acting with badly performedsinging starts off a long journey holding hands with some of the worstCGI Hollywood have managed to but to screen in ages.

A film that is over 50% GCI, should focus on making that partbelievable, unfortunately for this film, it's far from that. It lookslike the original film was ripped apart frame by frame and thebeautiful hand-painted drawings have been replaced with digitalcaricatures. Besides CGI that is bad, it's mostly creepy. As the littleteacup boy will give me nightmares for several nights to come. EmmaWatson plays the same character as she always does, with very littleacting effort and very little conviction as Belle. Although I can seewhy she was cast in the film based on merits, she is far from the rightchoice for the role. Dan Stevens does alright under as some motioncaptured dead-eyed Beast, but his performance feels flat as well. LukeEvans makes for a great pompous Gaston, but a character that has littledepth doesn't really make for a great viewing experience. Josh Gad is agreat comic relief just like the original movie's LeFou. Other thanthat, none of the cast stands out enough for me to remember them. Humanor CHI creature. I was just bored through out the whole experience. Andfor a project costing $160 000 000, I can see why the PR department ispushing it so hard because they really need to get some cash back onthis pile of wet stinky CGI-fur!

All and all, I might be bias from really loving Disney's firstadaptation. That for me marks the high-point of all their work,perfectly combining the skills of their animators along with some CGIin a majestic blend. This film however is more like the bucket you washoff your paintbrush in, it has all the same colors, but muddled withwater and to thin to make a captivating story from. The film is quitefrankly not worth your time, you would be better off watching theoriginal one more time.

Reviewed byLaLaLandSucksVote: 1/10/10

This adaptation is a disgrace to the original. Watson's voice is auto-tuned to death and the Beast CGI wasn't good. Each time the Beastpopped up, he was very off putting. Watson's line deliveries are poorand doesn't do the animated princess justice. She also seems a bit tooyoung for the role. She is a total miscast. Despite the Beast's CGI, atleast his performance was very good as both the Beast and Princecompared to Watson. Emma Thompson's rendition of Tale as Old as Timedoes not beat the animated tea cup, but at least she was not auto tunedto death. There are very few moments of originality as it is a frame byframe copy to the animated film. It's very uninspiring and unnecessary.

0/10.

An Honest ReviewReviewed bygenerationofswineVote: 1/10

If it were in a theater rather than a cinema, it would have been great.

But the fact is we saw this before when it was called Beauty & the Beast.

The songs we all heard before. Rather than an animated background you have a computer animated background but we have still seen it before.

We sit down and pay to watch a movie we already saw turn live action and follow the same plot, the same game, as the movie we fell in love with oh so many years ago.

We are living in an era for that, but we still want it to change at least a little.

Like all remakes it is dull and boring and utterly mindless. Like all remakes it makes changes that are unnecessary and irritating and in some cases, fairly insulting to the fans of the original: Belle, not her father, is the eccentric town inventor and that would, maybe, work if he wasn't supposed get locked up for being, well, the eccentric town inventor with a story about a Beast.

Take away the establishment of one character that is sort of necessary to the plot and give it to another where it is less important to advance the story and do it only because, well, it's a remake, you have to find at least one way to really insult the fans...

And changes like this are the only way to do it because, otherwise, you have the EXACT same movie you saw before with little changes made to really just drag the monotony out as much as you can.

I hate remakes, but the fact that it IS THE SAME MOVIE just makes it so much more monotonous to watch than your average remake.

Beauty and the Beast (2017) 1080p Related Movies

Venom (2018) 1080p Poster

Venom (2018) 1080p

Saving Christmas (2017) Poster

Saving Christmas (2017)

Creed II (2018) 1080p Poster

Creed II (2018) 1080p

Patrick (2018) Poster

Patrick (2018)

The Journey of Natty Gann (1985) Poster

The Journey of Natty Gann (1985)

Cinderella The Enchanted Beginning (2018) Poster

Cinderella The Enchanted Beginning (2018)

Travels of Mr. Blot (1986) 1080p Poster

Travels of Mr. Blot (1986) 1080p

Avengers: Infinity War (2018) 1080p Poster

Avengers: Infinity War (2018) 1080p

LEGO Star Wars | Pablo Honey (Deluxe Edition) CD2 | Orphan Black